Film ReviewsFilm FeaturesFilmmakingRegional FilmFilm Forums

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z

 

12:08 East of Bucharest (15)

12:08 East of Bucharest (2006)   

 

Dir. Corneliu Porumboiu, 2006, Romania, 89 mins

Drama/World Cinema

Cast: Mircea Andreescu, Teodor Corban, Ion Sapdaru

Review by Michael Bartlett

Not so long ago, a leading DVD rental company put out a bizarre plea to its customers. It had noticed that, during an entire 12 months of business, no-one had taken out a single Eastern European title, and so found itself desperately begging its clientele to try the wares of countries who, in the glory days of the ‘60s, had been at the forefront of cinematic experiment. Fast forward to 2007 and the situation couldn’t be more different, with Romania of all places leading the way. One of its filmmakers took the Palme d’Or this year (Cristian Mungiu for 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days), his compatriot Christi Puiu’s The Death of Mr Lazarescu was the surprise triumph of last year, and now Porumboiu’s adroit comedy lands on our shores.

Now, it may be politically incorrect to say so, but the reasons why Eastern European cinema generates little enthusiasm are frankly obvious. What is our stereotypical view of that part of the world? Grey buildings, grey people, dingy cars and dingier apartments, and, of course, poverty – and it’s an immutable law that poverty puts people off. The Americans learned that early on and that’s partly why their films are so popular. And Eastern European art seems inextricably tied up with rather unattractive elements: the oppressive shadow of Communism, bureaucracy, heavy political irony and that godawful folk music that sets your teeth on edge.

12:08 East of Bucharest opens with that music and then cuts to shots of grey estates where the street lamps are fitfully struggling into life. Oh, dear. We move into bare apartments and there is mention of the 1989 Revolution… (“How long is this movie?”) But wait - a welcome streak of humour starts to make itself evident and it becomes clear that the very grimness of this opening is part of the director’s conception – precisely that modern Romania does not look so very different from its Communist past. There is an atmosphere of muddling through on meagre resources, the owner of a TV station farcically mounting a current affairs programme with only one cameraman and a wall-mounted photo of the town square. And the implication therefore that that very Revolution, which will become the subject of the film, was in itself an illusion…

The format of the film is simple but neat. Two veterans of the Revolution are invited to appear on a local TV show on the anniversary of the event. But as soon as they start airing their memories, the channel receives a barrage of telephone calls from viewers who remember events slightly differently and accuse the interviewees of lying. Porumboiu hits his stride here. The first half of the film in which the characters are set up treads water a little, but once the action moves inside the TV studio, the director makes full use of his conceit. The restriction to a static, TV-camera set-up actually creates a kind of comic tension, as the characters are trapped in front of its gaze and those of the carping pundits at home. It also allows this young director to “examine” these protagonists of his country’s history, putting them under the microscope to both revel in and sympathise with their growing embarrassment.

Ultimately, the debate comes down to a ridiculously hair-splitting line of enquiry: did people start massing in the town square before or after the announcement of Ceausescu’s fall? One answer and the Revolution is real, the other and it’s a myth. The two interviewees are ridiculed as it becomes clear their conception of time on the day was, shall we say, muddled. But, at the same time, we sympathise with their dilemma as it becomes clear that many of their attackers, particularly a slimy, ex-Securitate official, clearly pine for the days of Communist certainties. Porumboiu’s point is precisely that a Revolution is not built on facts but on a state of mind. In a way, his film links to John Ford – “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend”. Even if that legend leads to the same grey streets and big white lies of before…

 

 

HOME    CONTACTS    REVIEWS    FEATURES    FILMMAKING    REGIONAL FILM    FORUMS    NEWSLETTER
diary archive magazine forums HOME CONTATCS home diary