Film ReviewsFilm FeaturesFilmmakingRegional FilmFilm Forums

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z

The Good Shepherd (15)

   

 

Dir. Robert De Niro , US, 2006, 167 mins

Cast: Matt Damon, Robert De Niro, Angelina Jolie

Review by Carol Allen

This is an ambitious project – the story of the CIA, dramatised with fictional and some real life characters. The central character Edward Wilson (Damon), through whose eyes the story is told, is apparently loosely based on a real life founder operative. The title refers to the biblical passage:“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.”

The story's 20-odd year time scale is framed by the Bay of Pigs crisis in 1961, when Wilson's job is to find the "mole" in the service who has leaked vital information. It then goes into flashback starting with Wilson's student days at Yale in 1939, where he is recruited into the “Skull and Bones”, a sort of Freemason-type secret society, which throws interesting light on the American class system and how the monied classes control the power.

When war breaks out in Europe, he is recruited by General Sullivan (De Niro) into the Office of Strategic Services, with a brief to co-operate with and learn from the British using their long experience of the spying trade, an expertise which at this stage America lacks. That experience is represented in the film by the ever excellent Michael Gambon as a Yale professor, who is not what he appears to be and Billy Crudup, camply English as a sort of Kim Philby figure. Then after the war Wilson is invited to join the CIA, newly created to deal with Cold War situation.

A potentially interesting story historically, the film has a lot of ground to cover, but its attempt to bring it to life through Wilson's eyes meets with limited success. Damon has proved himself a first-class actor in other movies, but while he holds the whole thing together well, the role itself is all a bit one note. He spends virtually the whole film looking stern. His personal story does occasionally come to life however, particularly in scenes with Jolie in an unusual role for her as his neglected wife Clover, which she plays rather well; with his son (Eddie Redmayne), who follows him into the service; and in his relationship with the German interpreter (Hanna Schiller), with whom he has an affair in post war Berlin. In fact, one of the main messages of the film seems to be that working for the CIA ruins your personal relationships.

There are also some very good supporting performances – William Hurt as the head of the CIA; John Torturro as Wilson's blue collar born right-hand man, who does most of his dirty work; John Sessions as a Russian defector who may or may not be a double agent and De Niro as the ageing, mobility challenged Sullivan. It's also very well filmed and effectively recreates the various periods through which it moves. It is at times a bit of a ponderous plod through history, lacking the energy and focus of classic spy dramas like The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, while in its ambition for historical and political perspective it's morally ambiguous and indecisive in its stance, being both patriotic yet at the same time admitting that the CIA is not always well behaved. Rather as he did with Munich, screenwriter Eric Roth seems to have done a lot of thorough research and is eager to get it all in, with the result that often the information is leading the characters rather than the characters leading the story. The film would have benefited from a tighter, more focused screenplay with a more consistently engaging narrative, and the occasional touch of humour would have lifted it. It’s very heavy and even in pace and mood, too long for what it has to say. But if you’re patient, there are plenty of good things in this film to enjoy.

 

 
HOME    CONTACTS    REVIEWS    FEATURES    FILMMAKING    REGIONAL FILM    FORUMS    NEWSLETTER
diary archive magazine forums HOME CONTATCS home diary